a first look at the prophet (Islam’s prophet, that is) – book review

My mother-in-law recommended the audiobook of Karen Armstrong’s Muhammad: A Prophet for our Time, narrated by the author.  Also, I’ve wanted to learn something more about Islam’s history, as two of the countries I work in (the Gambia and Sierra Leone) are heavily Muslim.

I listened to it: it was informative but it took me a while.  My thoughts:

informative if generous introduction to the prophet and his context

Karen Armstrong, noted religious historian, writes here her second biography of the prophet Muhammad, this time with the explicit intention of combating the rampant Islamophobia of the West.

I knew almost nothing of the prophet before reading this book, and so Armstrong’s is a welcome (if not scintillating – she can be a bit dry) introduction. I appreciated the historical and cultural context she placed him in, the stories from his life, and her non-condescension towards the spiritual. That said, her bias seems clear by the end: This is a favorable portrayal. Muhammad eschews luxury (“not simply a waste of money, but ingratitude, a thankless squandering of Allah’s precious bounty”), he champions religious tolerance, non-violence, and women’s rights (the veil was only for his wives, to protect them from his enemies). Armstrong seeks to put his repeated marrying and his sometimes brutal actions (beheading several hundred Jews, for example) into an – again, sympathetic – cultural context. Of course, with books like The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion on the market, a sympathetic portrayal from a learned outsider is perhaps welcome. Yet I would have appreciated a more balanced-feeling book. And Armstrong gives no clues to the gap between the Muhammad she portrays and the perceptions of Islam by the West today (oppression of women, religious intolerance and violence among certain subpopulations). That said, as Laurie Goodstein writes, this may be a good way “to glimpse how the vast majority of the world’s Muslims understand their prophet and their faith” [1].

With those caveats: I would recommend this to a novice desiring to learn of the prophet; but of course, since I haven’t read any others, perhaps I’m not the one to ask. (Once I tried Introducing Muhammad but drifted on to other books.)

I located three professional reviews easily available on-line. One is positive: “Ms. Armstrong argues that he [Muhammad] prevailed by compassion, wisdom and steadfast submission to God. This is the power of his story and the reason that more parents around the world name their children Muhammad than any other name” [1]. The other two are negative, one on content (the book “is a thinly veiled hagiography” [2]) and the other on style (“Readers will find her style stilted” [3]).

[1] Laurie Goodstein, “Seeing Muhammad as Both a Prophet and a Politician,” New York Times, 20 Dec 2006. [Also published in the International Herald Tribune.]
[2] Efraim Karsh, “The Perfect Surrender,” The New York Sun, 25 Sep 2006.
[3] Ilan Stavans, “The path of the prophet,” Boston Globe, 29 Oct 2006.

* I listened to the unabridged audiobook, narrated by the author. It was only six discs but took me a while, as this isn’t exactly a page-turner (or track-turner, if you will).

** One aspect I found particularly interesting was that some stories paralleled stories from my own faith tradition, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. For example, when one antagonist went to attach Muhammad and was instead converted, followed by another; this is evocative of a story about early Mormon apostle Wilford Woodruff. And when an army of Muslims is slaughtered but their bravery leads to the conversion of many of the attackers, the story of the Anti-Nephi-Lehis in the Book of Mormon comes to mind.

airplane reading

Last month Chris Blattman gave some highish-end reading for the airplane.  Tyler Cowen responded with some general counsel on the subject.  Around the same time I tried reading the inscrutable (to me) Pyramid Texts on a plane and failed miserably (watching lots of low-end movies instead).

Today on the NPR Books Podcast, I heard Nancy Pearl give several very specific recommendations, some of which I’ll be following up on…

Or – on my flight to Montana later this week – I may just read El juego del angel, Carlos Ruis Zafon’s sequel to the irresistable La sombra del viento.

what i’m reading

Muhammad: A Prophet for our time, by Karen Armstrong. Armstrong is explicit in her introduction that she’s combating Islamophobia, so hers is an admittedly sympathetic treatment. Still, it seems a worthy introduction to someone like me who is relatively ignorant about the Prophet’s life. On Muhammad’s eschewing of conspicuous consumption: “Luxury was not simply a waste of money but ingratitude, a thankless squandering of Allah’s precious bounty.”

The Humboldt Current: Nineteenth-Century Exploration and the Roots of American Environmentalism, by Aaron Sachs. “Good storytellers, like good ecologists, weave webs, enrapturing their audience with the delicate, sticky power of organic connectedness” (p30).

Something Wicked This Way Comes, by Ray Bradbury. Wicked carnival comes to town. Good and evil. Bradbury’s wonderful prose. Short chapters. My wife and I are reading this one aloud. I read it in college and loved it; we’ll see how it holds up.

Mr. Chickee’s Funny Money, by Christopher Paul Curtis. My wife and I are listening to the audiobook of this one. It’s an absurdly, (genuinely) hilarious young adult novel about a cuadrillion dollar bill with James Brown on the front.

 

malaria & education

+ (at the end) one hypothesis for why published randomized trials could disagree more than non-experimental studies

This week’s Lancet has a paper about the effect of treating schoolchildren for malaria in Kenya, by Sian Clarke, Matthew Jukes, and several other people. The study seems to have been very well done. Children in some schools received malaria treatment and children in other schools received placebos: Which were which was “revealed to the investigators only after completion of the statistical analysis.”

Children in treatment schools were healthier and had longer attention spans, but “no effect was shown for inattentive or hyperactive-compulsive behaviours or on educational achievement.”

This study is interesting because the intervention doesn’t just treat kids with malaria: it treats all kids. Apparently (from the article and the associated podcast), children who grow up in areas with lots of malaria develop a degree of immunity to malaria flare-ups (with the fevers and other symptoms with which I am intimately familiar) but still can have malaria in their system which has other negative effects like anemia.

The authors conclude “Effective malaria interventions could be a valuable addition to school health programmes.” In the podcast (July 12), the always charismatic World Bank researcher Don Bundy explains that the study is being replicated in Senegal and in a different part of Kenya.

The lack of effects on school performance stands in contrast to a recent study in Sri Lanka that found significant impacts of malaria treatment on children’s school performance. This reminds me of Worrall’s paper (which I blogged about earlier) which pointed to a greater tendency among randomized trials to see disparate results than among non-experimental trials. One plausible explanation for this is that non-experimental trials are subject to greater publication bias: A non-experimental trial has to meet a higher bar to publish a dissenting result than a randomized trial. This could lead to more variance in published experimental trial results.

I don’t find it particularly surprising that we have lots of variation across randomized trials. Contexts are different. Heartening? No. Surprising? No.

the unforgiving tree

For everyone who found Shel Silverstein’s story The Giving Tree problematic:

[Comic from Perry Bible Fellowship Comics]

In fact, I just discovered a whole symposium on The Giving Tree,* in which an ethics professor, a rabbi, several religion professors, and others think deeply about this tale.

* in a 1995 issue of First Things: The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life

[Hat tip to Sarah of Sarah’s Pensieve]

ARC: 50 readers and 60 reviews!

Wow!  When I posted the Africa Reading Challenge back in December 2007, I didn’t imagine so much interest.  50 people have now posted reading lists, and 60 reviews have been posted: here are the most recent ten, from Egypt to South Africa, from Congo to Kenya.  It’s great to see familiar works (Things Fall Apart) and unfamiliar (the Akpan book, which I’ll be getting thanks to Amani’s awesome quote – see No 8 below).

  1. Challenge of the Barons, by Lekan Are / Nigeria (Magic Man)
  2. The Wizard of the Nile: The Hunt for Africa’s Most Wanted, by Matthew Green / Uganda (Rob Crilly)
  3. Paradise, by Mike Resnick / Kenya (sort of) (La Lucuma)
  4. Heart of Darkness, by Joseph Conrad / Congo (elgoose)
  5. Chameleon Days, by Tim Bascom / Ethiopia (Kate)
  6. Things Fall Apart, by Chinua Achebe / Nigeria (elgoose)
  7. Mine Boy, by Peter Abraham / South Africa (Angela)
  8. Say You’re One of Them, by Uwem Akpan / Nigeria, Gabon, Rwanda, Ethiopia, Kenya (Amani): “If you are looking for a super depressing book to read, then look no further… It’s obvious that Mr. Akpan is a tremendous talent.”
  9. The No. 1 Ladies’ Detective Agency, by Alexander McCall Smith / Botswana (Alisia)
  10. The Yacoubian Building, by Alaa Al Aswany (tr. Humphrey Davies) / Egypt (Alisia)