top 16 dystopian novels of all time

From PopCrunch, which provides book covers and descriptions…  I’ve read 8; you?

16. That Hideous Strength by CS Lewis

15. The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood

14. The Sword of Spirits trilogy by John Christopher

13. World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max Brooks

12. V for Vendetta by Alan Moore and David Lloyd

11. Neuromancer by William Gibson

10. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick

9. The Book of The New Sun by Gene Wolfe

8. A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr.

7. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

6. I Am Legend by Richard Matheson

5. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

4. Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell

3. A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess

2. The Road by Cormac McCarthy

1. The Diamond Age, or A Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer by Neal Stephenson

16. That Hideous Strength by CS Lewis

Best known for his Narnia novels, CS Lewis also wrote a trilogy dealing with visiting other planets—well the first two books did. The third was about preventing the evil forces of industrialization and progressive thought from taking over England. It was also grossly misogynistic. It seems Lewis was a big fan of the “women belong in the kitchen” mindset. For all its occasional stodginess and backwards, it is, at times, still a rousing piece about the difficulties of modernity, and the damage it can do the world around you.

15. The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood

Wow, can you get more polar opposite of CS Lewis than Margaret Atwood? Despite her protestations of not writing science fiction, her story of a dystopian future where almost all women are infertile is most assuredly of the genre. Set in a future where disease and radiation have reduced fertility to a minimum, and a fascist military theocracy has taken over America (or at least part of it). Brutal in its critique of evangelist Christianity and their view on women, Handmaid’s Tale is a harrowing read at the best of times. In it, women have essentially been reduced to chattels, and the few fertile ones assigned to high-ranking military men in order to give them children.

14. The Sword of Spirits trilogy by John Christopher

While perhaps not as well known as some, John Christopher (the pen name of Samuel Youd) wrote a fantastic trilogy of young adult novels, set in a far future where the world has reverted to a feudal society after a global ecological disaster. This was the same pen name under which Youd wrote the excellent Tripods trilogy, but in my opinion the Sword of Spirits remains a greater work. His world building and subtle hints at the past are unparalleled. It’s not even hinted at for most of the first novel, instead just stranding you in what seems to be a standard fantasy stereotype.

13. World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max Brooks

This novel, combined with Brooks’ Zombie Survival Guide are all you need to face the inevitable zombie apocalypse. They’ll teach you well. While the survival guide was exactly that, WWZ was presented as an oral history, an account taken for the UN by the survivors of the horrors of zombies. Brooks did a huge amount of research for this novel, and approached it as a realistic governmental, technological and political take on what would happen if the dead really did rise. It is, without a doubt, an utterly terrifying concept, and Brooks approaches it with aplomb, showing us what a world partly overrun by the risen dead would be like.

12. V for Vendetta by Alan Moore and David Lloyd

I’m sure by now everyone’s seen the movie version of this classic comic, and I hate to sound like Comic Book Guy, but the graphic novel was far, far superior. Where the movie was an argument for democracy against fascism—hardly a contested view; the comic was an argument for anarchy. And not the daft 12 year old kid, but actual, well realized anarchy, involving the destruction of the Government in order to build a new society. It was radical and probing. The novel also had to cut many of the more interesting minor characters and smooth over the development of others. An obvious example is the character of Evey, who in the movie started as a strong independent women. In the comic, she was a terrified teenager, who only gained self-confidence through V absolutely destroying her spirit first.

11. Neuromancer by William Gibson

Lets just throw all of Gibson’s cyberpunk in here, shall we? He could easily take half the list otherwise. Neuromancer was seminal in the establishment of the sadly defunct cyberpunk genre, the cold war era view of the future as a dirty high tech shithole where everyone’s a bastard. Not quite sure why people don’t still think that way. Anyway, Gibson famously wrote Neuromancer on a typewriter, which is more than a touch ironic. With this novel he explored artificial intelligence, virtual reality, urban sprawl, genetic engineering, and generally gave people the heebie jeebies about the future. It also has possibly the most famous opening sentence in modern literature: “The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.”

10. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick

What I said before about Gibson taking up the entire list? Ibid for Dick. Fueled by drugs, paranoia, hallucinations and excellent writing he crafted many a world populated by police states and extreme surveillance. Androids is one of the better known ones, if only because the excellent Blade Runner was based on (part) of it. In a world where almost all animals are extinct and humans are radiation damaged, society comes to rely on empathy as the holiest of human traits. Eventually it becomes the only way to tell humans from increasingly advanced, but always heartless, androids. It’s a heady take on what it means to be human, and the nature of self.

9. The Book of The New Sun by Gene Wolfe

I’ve waxed lyrical about the Book of the New Sun before, and I’m not going to hesitate to do so again. Wolfe’s four volume future history is without a doubt one of the most under-appreciated works of modern science fiction. Its use of neologisms based in existing language structure, the imperfect narrator, and the incredibly detailed but only ever vaguely explained world all combine into an amazing story. The conceit of the entire quadrilogy being a diary cast back into time from the distant future is a device I’ve never seen used elsewhere. The world Wolfe constructs is filled with an amazing details which are only ever mentioned in passing, as if everyone should know them. It’s a planet where miners dig up old technology instead of minerals. Or were an entire mountain range has been carved up so that every peak commemorates a dead ruler. It’s one of the few pieces of science fiction that I know of that’s had entire books dedicated to its analysis. A magnificent series of novels that are worth getting hold of.

8. A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr.

Another post-nuclear novel (wow, sensing a trend here?), set in the 26th century (and beyond) about an order of monks attempting to save what remains of humanities learning and technology, by keeping and transcribing books. Over the course of a thousand years, from the anti-intellectual backlash following the nuclear war, through a new enlightenment, and to the onset of nuclear holocaust again, the priests of the Albertian Order of Leibowitz struggle to preserve and protect knowledge they only barely understand. It mulls over symbolism and themes of the circular and repetitive nature of history. Alphas and Omegas, A’s and Z’s. He also spends considerable time mulling over the differences between secular and religious institutions, as well the separation of church and state. It’s definitely an example of post-WWII/Cold War era fears about the future, but manages to remain undated.

7. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

Bradbury’s dystopia of book burning and universal censorship was written in an attempt to communicate how he thought television would destroy literacy, and the damaging effects of censorship. The novel is focussed on literal book burning, and the censorship and suppression of literature is often brought up as the theme of the book, but in later interview Bradbury maintained it was actually that television would remove all desire for people to read, and gain knowledge. That the populace themselves would support the destruction of books, and be happy to reduce their knowledge to factoids without context. Wow, oddly prescient. Luckily the internet has us reading large amounts of text every day, even if it just is “lol noobz!”.

6. I Am Legend by Richard Matheson

The novel, not the shitty Will Smith movie. The movie pissed me off immensely, as it completely missed the point of the goddamn story. Matheson’s story was about vampires, not freaking zombies. It was brutal, misogynistic, and bitterly, bitterly sad. Robert Neville is possibly the only uninfected human being left on earth, who struggles to survive in Los Angeles, venturing out during the day, and dealing with his alcoholism, regrets and rampaging vampires at night. A big chunk of the novella is his slow and methodical learning of science so that he can understand what causes the vampirism. As tempted as I am to spoiler the novel’s end (and the title’s relevance), lets just say it’s much better than Will Smith’s version, and puts an excellent spin on monster myths.

5. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley


I’m sure by now everyone’s read Huxley’s far future novel of constant orgies, drugs and television. Huh, that actually sounds kinda nice doesn’t it? Well, apart from the sleep learning, rigid caste structures, and complete removal of reproductive rights. Henry T. Ford is worshiped, and his views on production and the assembly line extend to human beings as well. It’s a brutal critique of a thoughtless society, obsessed with consumerism and sex rather than anything deeper, and one that views any permanent connection between people as bordering on pornographic. Considering it was written in 1931, it seems quite prescient (as much good dystopian fiction does), and stands as a self-inflicted counter-point to the rigid dystopia of our next entry…

4. Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell

While Brave New World cast the horrific future as a soporific world where everyone chose their own downfall by caring more about pleasures of the flesh than their fellow man, 1984 was the opposite—a totalitarian dictatorship enforced by constant surveillance, propaganda, and jackbooted thugs. Often taken as an anti-communist rant, 1984 is a warning about the dangers of totalitarianism, regardless of its origins. It’s such a pervasive view of a dystopian future, that so much of our lexicon to deal with the concept is drawn directly from this novel: Orwellian, Big Brother, Newspeak. Without 1984, what else would we have to compare Governments to when they did something we slightly disagreed with?

3. A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess

There are two ways to read Clockwork Orange: you can either look at the glossary explaining the combination of russian, english schoolboy and constructed slang every five seconds, or you can just read it through, and hope to pick up the vocabulary as you go. Sure Burgess was a pompous windbag, but he also crafted an excellent tale of drug abuse, ultraviolence, and aversion therapy. This is one of the few situations where I’ll recommend the film as being as excellent as the novel, as it was one of Kubrick’s finest—except in one regard. American versions of the novel printed before 1986 were missing a final chapter, which Kubrick wasn’t aware of. In it, Alex grows tired of violence and drugs, and decides to settle down and start a family with a normal job. While it may sound like a cop out ending, it focuses far more the banality of evil, and how people who do utterly reprehensible things in their early days can become functional members of society.

2. The Road by Cormac McCarthy

There’s bleak, then there’s freaking Cormac McCarthy. McCarthy boils down the essence of a post-apocalyptic dystopia to its bare bones, completely omitting almost all details. There’s a father and son, who are never named. There was a nuclear disaster, and almost all plants and animals are dead, with humans mainly reduced to cannibalism. They’re trying to get somewhere warmer (and hopefully better) before winter hits, and the father is slowly dying of radiation poisoning. While the ending has the slightest possible glimmer of hope, the rest is just ash filled skies, storms and people torturing and eating one another. For all its stark bleakness, it still won the Pulitzer Prize in 2007, which should give you an indication of its pedigree.

1. The Diamond Age, or A Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer by Neal Stephenson

unexpected perverse impacts of universal kindergarten

Elizabeth Cascio, an economist at Dartmouth, just published a study on the impact of kindergarten becoming universal in the United States because of state funding in the 1960s and 1970s.

My results indicate that state funding of universal kindergarten had no discernible impact on many of the long-term outcomes desired by policymakers, including grade retention, public assistance receipt, employment, and earnings. White children were 2.5 percent less likely to be high school dropouts and 22 percent less likely to be incarcerated or otherwise institutionalized as adults following state funding initiatives, but no other effects could be discerned. Also, I find no positive effects for African Americans, despite comparable increases in their enrollment in public kindergartens after implementation of the initiatives. These findings suggest that even large investments in universal early-childhood education programs do not necessarily yield clear benefits, especially for more disadvantaged students.

How did she measure this?

I take advantage of the staggered introduction of state funding for kindergarten from the 1960s forward, combined with the fact that children generally attend kindergarten at age five. More specifically, I calculate the average difference in outcomes between individuals who were age five before the introduction of kindergarten funding and children born in the same state who were five years old after the initiative was introduced. I further adjust these comparisons to take into account the fact that kindergarten enrollment was increasing gradually in many states prior to the adoption of state funding.

Why didn’t the program benefit blacks?

She proposes three hypotheses, but the “first of these hypotheses receives the most support in the available data”: “Kindergarten funding disproportionately drew African Americans out of higher-quality education settings.” Specifically, “the introduction of state funding for kindergarten prompted a reduction in Head Start participation among African Americans.”

So universal kindergarten may have actually pulled blacks out of better programs, into lower quality universal programs!
Continue reading “unexpected perverse impacts of universal kindergarten”

choice versus circumstance in Tanzanian pre-schools

An article on early child development in Tanzania’s newspaper This Day ends with the following analysis

Usually, where there is need, there is opportunity. Realising the big demand for preschool education in Tanzania, many people are capitalising more on this situation to do business rather than provide good early childhood education. Many of the so-called preschools and daycare centres are unfurnished, staffed with unqualified teachers and located in run-down buildings without the necessary sanitation facilities. The prime concern of their private operators is money. Only a few preschools, largely run by religious institutions, offer a high-quality learning curriculum that helps cultivate in children skills for further education. Their standards have led to improved achievements by their former pupils.

But many other preschools being operated in private home grounds and backwoods simply cannot push forward the frontiers of a child’s learning. Yet, these are the places where the majority of low-income families crowd their kids because the cost is low.

The poor normally don’t realise that cheap things eventually cost double.

This strikes me as fundamentally contradictory. The final statement suggests that the poor are to blame, that they put their children in low-quality pre-schools because they fail to realize the poor long-term returns, when in fact the preceding observations suggest that very few options are even available. Would poor families be willing to pay more if higher quality institutions were available? Perhaps! Let’s give them a chance and find out! This echoes what I’ve been reading in Devi Sridhar’s The Battle Against Hunger: Choice, Circumstance, and the World Bank, which explores a nutrition program that focuses entirely on choice and insufficiently on the circumstances around the choice set.

cheating on a social welfare program: it’s all in the histogram

A Colombian welfare program made the formula used to assign benefits public to local officials in 1997.  Compare the distribution of households just below (left) and above (right) of the eligibility threshhold in 1994 and in 2003.  Seems an awful lot of households just barely qualify in 2003…

Kudos to Adriana Camacho and Emily Conover for the nice detective work in this paper: Manipulation of Social Program Eligibility: Detection, Explanations and Consequences for Empirical Research.

what makes a great teacher

The current issue of Atlantic Monthly has a great article on what makes a great teacher, which both gives results of quantitative analysis and impressive case studies. Highly recommended.

An excerpt:
"For years, the secrets to great teaching have seemed more like alchemy than science, a mix of motivational mumbo jumbo and misty-eyed tales of inspiration and dedication. But for more than a decade, one organization has been tracking hundreds of thousands of kids, and looking at why some teachers can move them three grade levels ahead in a year and others can’t. Now, as the Obama administration offers states more than $4 billion to identify and cultivate effective teachers, Teach for America is ready to release its data. …

Right away, certain patterns emerged. First, great teachers tended to set big goals for their students. They were also perpetually looking for ways to improve their effectiveness. For example, when Farr called up teachers who were making remarkable gains and asked to visit their classrooms, he noticed he’d get a similar response from all of them: “They’d say, ‘You’re welcome to come, but I have to warn you—I am in the middle of just blowing up my classroom structure and changing my reading workshop because I think it’s not working as well as it could.’ When you hear that over and over, and you don’t hear that from other teachers, you start to form a hypothesis.” Great teachers, he concluded, constantly reevaluate what they are doing.

Superstar teachers had four other tendencies in common: they avidly recruited students and their families into the process; they maintained focus, ensuring that everything they did contributed to student learning; they planned exhaustively and purposefully—for the next day or the year ahead—by working backward from the desired outcome; and they worked relentlessly, refusing to surrender to the combined menaces of poverty, bureaucracy, and budgetary shortfalls.

But when Farr took his findings to teachers, they wanted more. “They’d say, ‘Yeah, yeah. Give me the concrete actions. What does this mean for a lesson plan?’” [End of excerpt]

Amanda Ripley tells us. The full results of the Teach for America analysis are in Steven Farr’s book Teaching As Leadership: The Highly Effective Teacher’s Guide to Closing the Achievement Gap. Here is a partly worthy and partly less worthy critique of the article (her good point is that having uber-motivated teachers won’t fix structural problems in the system: true!).

awesome genre-bending book (review): As She Climbed Across the Table, by Jonathan Lethem

physics, anthropology, a tiny universe, faculty absurdity, all in a Lethem day’s work

Philip, an anthropologist, is in love with Alice, a physicist.  A colleague of Alice’s does an experiment in which he opens up a tiny new universe.  The new universe’s only characteristic is that, when you throw things into it, it accepts some of them and rejects others.  Alice falls in love with the new universe.  Philip remains in love with Alice.  The universe, named Lack, accepts and rejects.  Mayhem ensues?

As usual, Lethem is difficult to characterize, but that doesn’t keep him from remaining GREAT.  This is my third Lethem book: Gun, with Occasional Music was crime noire mixed with science fiction; Motherless Brooklyn was crime noire with a protagonist with Tourette’s.  As She Climbed is … satire of academic intellectualism and university life?  (Definitely.)  Science fiction?  (Kind of, but not mostly.)

I love three things about Jonathan Lethem, and this book delivers on all three:

  • He draws his allusions from Everywhere.  One moment he references Dr. Seuss (“I am the Lorax, I thought.  I speak for the trees.”), the next it’s “Tang, the drink of the astronauts”, and in the last few pages we encounter a great allusion to the Greek myth of Persephone;
  • He is wonderfully creative.  In this novel, physicists, post-modern literary theorists, anthropologists, go head to head.  A woman falls in love with a universe.  Two blind men have their own language and explore the concept of time travel (see the excerpt at the end).  On and on. 
  • His prose is fast and clever.  I couldn’t put down his other two books (that I’ve read: Gun and Motherless).  This one, a little less frenetic (since it’s not a crime novel, after all) was still compelling. 

The ending is – in my opinion – fabulous, from a delightful faculty Christmas party to the surprising closure.

Excerpt on time travel from Gath, one of the blind guys, to Evan, the other blind guy: “I mean, if my watch says five-thirty, and I go around all day believing in that, and then I run into you and your watch says five o’clock, half an hour difference, and we’ve both gone around all day half an hour different – your two, my two-thirty, your four-fifteen, my four-forty-five, half an hour in the past relative to me, and certain of it, just as certain as I am, and we begin arguing, and then, at that moment, the rest of the world blow up, huh, just completely disappears, and we’re all that’s left, there’s no other reference point, no other observer, and for me it’s five-thirty and for you it’s five, isn’t that a form of time travel?” 86

Potentially objectionable content:  Maybe a little language, it didn’t stand out to me.  No sex scenes, but a few references to sex.

the economist and the anthropologist

There is a story about an economist and an anthropologist which goes something like that: The economist asks the anthropologist, ‘I see you know everyone in this village closely, but do you know anyone outside this village?’ ‘But explain to me,’ replies the anthropologist, ‘you know a little bit about everyone in the world, but do you know anyone at all?’

Economist Amartya Sen, in the foreword to anthropolist Devi Sridhar’s The Battle Against Hunger: Choice, Circumstance, and the World Bank (2008)

amusing book (review): The Titan’s Curse, by Rick Riordan, narrated by Jesse Bernstein

monsters, Greek gods and demi-gods, adventure, mildly amusing fun

Percy Jackson, son of Poseidon, goes on a quest to save his friend Annabeth.  New friends are made.  Monsters attack.  Lots of Greek characters wander in and out.  I listened to this audiobook during a recent business trip.  It was fun: not exceptional, but a good time.  I have enjoyed getting to know the Greek characters and have wanted to go back to my copy of D’Aulaires’ Book of Greek Myths to read more.  I will definitely listen to the last two books in the series.

Jesse Bernstein’s accents in the audiobook drive me crazy, but I’ll survive.

books for people who love books

The mother of book-lover books is, in my opinion, Anne Fadiman’s essay collection Ex Libris.  Fadiman also edited an essay collection called Rereadings, in which writers re-read a book that they had read as a youth.  [Here’s a funny story about ReWatching movies Too Much, from The Moviegoer’s Companion.]  I really enjoyed it.  Nick Hornby’s The Polysyllabic Spree is a collection of essays about what he’s been reading, and it’s a blast, written with Hornby’s characteristic wit.  I’m most of the way through it, reading it aloud with my wife, and he has two more volumes of the same: Housekeeping vs the Dirt and Shakespeare Wrote for Money.

I read Nelson’s So Many Books, So Little Time a few years ago and didn’t love it.  Ex Libris Lite, as a friend said.  Stick with Fadiman.  or Fadiman.  or Hornby.

What am I missing that you recommend?