economic gangsters coming to your neighborhood

economic gangsters

You read Tropical Gangsters.  You watched American Gangster.  You read about the Economic Hit Man.  But nobody’s safe when the Economic Gangsters come to town.

My friend and colleague Ted Miguel is coming out with a book this fall, bound to be a good time with insight to boot.  From the website:

Meet the economic gangster. He’s the United Nations diplomat who double-parks his Mercedes on New York streets at rush hour because the cops can’t touch him—he has diplomatic immunity. He’s the Chinese smuggler who dodges tariffs by magically transforming frozen chickens into frozen turkeys. The dictator, the warlord, the crooked bureaucrat who bilks the developing world of billions in aid. The calculating crook who views stealing and murder as just another part of his business strategy. And, in the wrong set of circumstances, he just might be you.

In Economic Gangsters, Raymond Fisman and Edward Miguel take readers into the secretive, chaotic, and brutal worlds inhabited by these lawless and violent thugs.

I’m not sure if the double-parking diplomat was the most intimidating way to introduce the gangster, but still…  Recommended reading this October.

* My take on the prequels: Tropical Gangsters was great, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man was underwhelming, and I didn’t see American Gangster.

book review: The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, by Taleb

I’ve been interested in this since I read a good review in the Economist, and I recently discovered the unabridged audiobook.  With a book on risk and probability, one never knows how exciting the ride will be, but Taleb very pleasantly surprised me.  He needs a harsher editor, but overall I learned a lot and enjoyed the vast majority.  My thoughts:

a valuable book for reframing your thinking on reasoning and rare events

Not for some time has a book affected my thinking as much as this one. Taleb’s self-described “personal essay” is way too long and sometimes a little too angry, but his exposition of the flaws in our thinking has provided a new and useful lens for much of my own thinking. One salient example is the narrative fallacy: “our predilection for compact stories over raw truths” (p63). We tend to assign causes and reasons for events even when we lack any evidence of connections: We want to tell stories. Many of these stories are harmless, but others can keep us from being open to truth when it appears.

A second example is the problem of silent evidence: If one uses worshippers who prayed and survived a subsequent shipwreck as evidence of the efficacy of prayer, an observer might ask, What of those who prayed and then drowned? “The drowned worshippers, being dead, would have a lot of trouble advertising their experiences from the bottom of the sea” (p100). It’s not that I’ve never noticed these fallacies before, but having a name for them makes them much easier to identify. These points and many more like them make this volume a worthy read.

The titular Black Swans are events with three characteristics: (1) they are outside of regular expectations because nothing in the past convincingly points to their possibility, (2) they carry an extreme impact, and (3) they are explainable and predictable after the fact although not before (p. xvii-xviii). Taleb argues that many modern phenomena, including the distribution of wealth (Bill Gates’s income), book and movie success (the Da Vinci Code), and mortality in modern warfare (to name a few) are subject to Black Swan events. Many natural and historical phenomena (such as the distribution of human heights or mortality in traditional warfare) are not as subject to Black Swans.

None of the standard statistical tools used for analysis in finance, economics, and social sciences are capable of accounting for Black Swans, making them – according to Taleb – worse than worthless, as they give a false sense of knowledge and security. (For example, he demonstrates how wildly erroneous financial projections unfailingly are and asks why these are useful.)

Taleb makes his point in thirty different ways, gives his personal history, insults economists repeatedly, and creates a number of hypothetical characters. He sometimes expounds too informally given the paradigm-shifting point he is trying to make, but overall the book has much to offer. He outlines a whole host of psychological biases and reasoning fallacies (beyond the two I mentioned above) that affect our thinking and predicting, often blinding us to the possibility of black swans.

Most of the book is non-technical [not that I’m the best judge of that, with an advanced economics degree], but a few chapters towards the end get into more technical detail: Taleb warns us in advance.

I listened to the unabridged audiobook narrated by David Chandler [12 CDs], published by Recorded Books. The narration is very good (with the exception that the narrator always pronounces foreign names with a little pause and a flare, like it’s a separate performance; but that’s a small and entertaining flaw).

[Note on content: The book uses strong language a handful of times.]

it takes more than a harrison ford movie and a newspaper column to convince me that economics undermines community

I just listened to (most of) an interview with Harvard Economics professor Stephen Marglin on his new book The Dismal Science: How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community:

Marglin argues that markets and commercial transactions undermine the connections between us. He wants people to pay more attention to what is lost and not just what is gained by the pursuit of material well-being. Topics discussed include the nature of community, the role that voluntary associations play in our lives, the costs and benefits of mobility, the role of insurance in reducing our dependence on each other, and the nature of knowledge.

Sounds great, right?  I am open to the idea that commercial transactions reduce that human something, but the case needs a better advocate than Marglin.  Economists talk about social capital all the time, which is what voluntary assocations are.  Development economists talk about informal insurance mechanisms (what Marglin calls “community”) all the time.

In the interview, his principal evidence consists of (a) a scene from the Harrison Ford film Witness, (b) a Wall Street Journal column about a family that moved for a job and had to shoot their dog because it couldn’t fit in the van, and (c) something less memorable.  He argues that these things are not conducive to statistical measurement: That’s fine, but in its absence, I’d like a tight logical argument.

When the interviewer asked what the policy recommendations were based on the idea that free trade can undermine communities, Marglin had no answer.  When the interviewer brought up revealed preference (the fact that few people choose to be Amish even though the Amish have great community), the subject rapidly changed.

I have also read that the book is unconvincing.

HT: Chris Blattman for those 40 minutes of my life…

[End of rant]

social norms vs market norms

Last week on NPR I enjoyed this interview with Dan Ariely [link to the audio at the top of the page] about his new book, Predictably Irrational.  At the NPR link above, there is an excerpt about social norms vs market norms: Ariely tells the story of an Israeli daycare center which struggled with people picking kids up late.  The center introduced a fine for lateness and found that tardiness actually increased, with the story being that people stopped feeling guilty about being late since they were paying for it.  Then, when the fine was removed, lateness did not fall to its earlier levels, suggesting that once you move from a social norm to a market norm, it’s very difficult to move back.  (Arieli gives other examples of this one-way street in an excerpt from his book.)

This reminds me of the debate in education on intrinsic (I teach because I care!) vs extrinsic (I teach because you pay me!) motivation.  Duflo, Hanna, and Ryan did a project paying teachers to show up to school in India (where teacher absenteeism is a major problem): they found that despite the introduction of extrinsic motivation (which substantially boosted teacher attendance), teachers worked about equally hard at school, suggesting that they didn’t lose their intrinsic motivation.  Unfortunately, this seems to be because the teachers in this sample spent very little time preparing for school, so perhaps they didn’t have much intrinsic motivation to lose.

advice for the day

“Do not listen to economic forecasters or to predictors in social science (they are mere entertainers).”

I think a part of me has always wanted to be an entertainer (harking back to those juggling shows I did in Mexico in 1994); maybe I should get into forecasting.

-from Taleb’s often insightful but woefully underedited diatribe The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbably, p203

the law of unintended consequences, manifest in potty training

In my economics work, I have often heard of the Law of Unintended Consequences,  defined by Tyler Cowen as follows:

When a simple system tries to regulate a complex system you often get unintended consequences.

A few weeks ago, my wife gave our three-year-old son an incentive: every time he poops in the potty, he gets to watch a few minutes of a dvd of his choice.  He really likes watching and we severely limit him, so this seemed like it might work.

The next morning, I get up early with him while my wife and the baby try to sleep a little longer.  Shortly thereafter I hear loud grunts and groans coming from the bathroom.  I rush in to find our son sitting on the toilet, trying to make poop out of nothing at all, just so he can watch a few choice scenes of Thomas the Tank Engine.

We have since revised the incentive scheme.  Some.

a link i enjoyed on taxes

Steve Landsburg (author of The Armchair Economist): Huckabee’s tax plan is brilliant: so why is it getting trashed?  I don’t support much of anything about Huckabee (especially that he pointed out that running for president is unlike playing bean bag: how wrong you are, Mr Huckabee!), but his tax plan appealed to me for the reasons Landsburg explains.

Thanks to Greg Mankiw for the pointer.

gambian research round-up

Yesterday I flew to Banjul, the Gambia, where I’m working on an impact evaluation of an education project.  In economics, it’s tempting to examine the research on the topic and to neglect the place, de-emphasizing context.  To add to the education reading I’ve done, I took a look around to see what other recent research has been done in the Gambia.  For being continental Africa’s smallest country, there is a lot.   

Some of it is far from my subject, like the paper on agriculture-related injuries and rural nursing service.  But other research, despite no blatant connection, has the potential to yield real insights into the context of my work.  A study on childhood vaccination practices uses qualitative methods to explore why some people are more likely to complete their children’s vaccination schedules, and those reasons could inform my hypotheses as to why some parents are much less active than others in the school management community.  Some of the methods used to produce a locally accessible film about tuberculosis could be tentatively applied to make education more accessible. 

In searching specifically for papers on the Gambia, I also found education papers that would never have turned up in a general education search but which provide invaluable background.  One paper assesses the returns to education in the Gambia; another explores the relationships between democracy and the structure of the Gambian education system. I’m learning my lesson: Read spatial, not just topical.